Determining custody can be a difficult, technically challenging, and extremely emotional part of the divorce process. This is especially true if the parents involved cannot agree, or if the case is particularly contentious.
It is helpful for parents to have a better grasp of the basics of custody and visitation so they can approach these issues with a clear understanding of the legal parameters, potential outcomes, and important considerations when attempting to reach an agreement with a co-parent or litigating a custody dispute.
What follows is a basic outline geared toward parents for that purpose. Keep in mind that state laws vary and that this post is not intended as legal advice. Before entering into any agreement, or becoming involved in litigation, you should consult with an attorney.
In our every-day use, custody refers to where a child resides. While the legal system also uses the word custody to refer to the physical residence of a child, it may also refer to which of the parents has the legal right to make major decisions for the child’s welfare, health, and general well-being. These decisions include significant choices for the child, such as religious upbringing, schooling, and major, non-emergency medical decisions.
What this means is that you may hear lawyers, judges and others in the legal system referring to “legal custody,” which is the decision-making authority, and “physical custody,” which is where the child resides.
Courts take into account many factors when reaching a decision about where a child should reside and what visitation arrangements should be made. While these factors may vary from state to state and their individual importance will be decided on a case-by-case basis, the overriding concern of the court, and parents, is the best interests of the child or children in question.
It is also important to know that in many states, physical custody is divided into “sole,” or “primary” physical custody, meaning that one parent has the majority of time with the children; and “shared,” or “joint” physical custody, meaning that the parents share roughly equal time with the children. These terms are also subject to interpretation and may carry with them important ramifications for other issues, such as child support, which are not discussed in this post. Often, the physical custody determination in a given case will have a profound impact on the parties’ child support obligations.
Courts often look at the fitness of the parents when making their decision. This includes factors such as:
As mentioned, these factors will be given different weight in every case, and there are others which a given set of circumstances may require consideration. In every case, whether decided by a judge, a mediator, or by the parties themselves, the chief concern will be the best interests of the children.
Like physical custody, legal custody is typically determined by balancing a host of factors. Again, the overriding concern of parents, lawyers and judges will be the best interests of the children in question.
The concept of legal custody can be understood as being “joint” or “sole.” In a joint legal custody arrangement, the parties are expected to communicate with one another and reach a mutually agreed upon decision regarding the major issues affecting their children’s health, welfare and well-being. If one parent is awarded sole legal custody, that parent has the sole right to make those decisions for the children.
There may also be a hybrid arrangement of joint and sole custody, wherein one party is awarded tie-breaking authority. This would matter in the event that the parents cannot reach a decision jointly, after they have discussed a decision for the child but still do not agree.
Again, legal custody refers to the authority to make decisions on behalf of the child which pertain to significant life events, like where the child attends school, their religious training, and similar decisions, not day-to-day questions of parental authority.
Courts typically consider the following factors when determining legal custody:
As with the physical custody factors, specific cases will call for individual evaluations of each of these, and potentially other, factors.
As you can see, many of the factors used to determine legal or physical custody overlap. This is because these concepts, while separate, are often linked, both in the way we think of them and the way that a court, or the parents themselves, may reach a determination of where a child will reside and who will have decision-making authority.
For instance, if one parent is awarded primary physical custody, and therefore have the children residing with them for the majority of the time, it may be impractical to award the other parent sole legal custody, because those decisions regarding the child’s religious upbringing and schooling may potentially impact the child’s daily schedule and where he or she may need to be transported.
In every case, the focus of any determination of custody, physical or legal, is going to be what is best for the children involved. Each of the considerations mentioned above, and others which may be important to any given set of circumstances, will always be examined through the lens of what will best serve the children.
While custody disputes are often emotionally trying cases, with an understanding of the considerations involved and keeping in mind that the children’s best interests will always be the paramount concern of the legal system, parents can work together or with their legal representatives for the best outcome for their children.
Benjamin Marcoux is a family law attorney at Houlon Bergman, Finci, Levenstein, & Skok.
He specializes in civil litigation, collaborative law, wills, and probate and has been selected as a Super Lawyers Rising Star in both 2012 and 2013.
Know more about 2houses